Author: admin

Submission of Written Questions to Planet Textiles 2019 Conference

Blogroll / Questions to conferences

We, the Union of Concerned Researchers in Fashion, recognize that the response of the fashion sector to the intensifying ecological crisis has been – and continues to be – over-simplified, fragmented and obstructed by the growth logic of extractive business models as they are currently realized and practiced. As a group of concerned researchers, supported by more than 380 signees from institutions around the world, our view is that textile and clothing researchers can no […]

UK Government rejects all recommendations of the Fixing Fashion report

Blogroll

The UK Government’s response to the recommendations of Parliament’s Environmental Audit Committee’s report, Fixing Fashion: Clothing Consumption and Sustainability is now published. The report, which was published in February 2019, called for an end to throwaway fashion and included a set of recommendations for environmental and labour market practices.  The UK Government has rejected each recommendation, including:– A new Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme to reduce textile waste with a one penny charge per garment […]

Arnhem communique

Activities / Local Assemblies

A local assembly of UCRF took place in Arnhem, The Netherlands on 5th June 2019 and involved around 70 people. Following an Open Space methodology, the local assembly put forward a range of urgent themes for debate and voted to discuss nine of them — a summary of the conversations follows. In addition, seven priorities for further action and consideration were put forward, the Arnhem communique in which the Union should seek to foreground: Interdependency […]

UCRF on 2019 Copenhagen Fashion Summit

Blogroll / Written statements

5th May 2019 As the programme for the 2019 Copenhagen Fashion Summit has now been published, the Union of Concerned Researchers in Fashion issues the following public comments on the programme. In particular, the Union wishes to highlight the paradoxical or even misleading use of language in describing “sustainable fashion” activity.