Submission of Written Questions to Planet Textiles 2019 Conference

comments 3
Blogroll / Questions to conferences

We, the Union of Concerned Researchers in Fashion, recognize that the response of the fashion sector to the intensifying ecological crisis has been – and continues to be – over-simplified, fragmented and obstructed by the growth logic of extractive business models as they are currently realized and practiced.

As a group of concerned researchers, supported by more than 380 signees from institutions around the world, our view is that textile and clothing researchers can no longer remain uninvolved or complacent, and we need to conduct ourselves in new ways.

We therefore pose the following questions to Planet Textiles conference 2019. These questions are available to download as a pdf here. We do this because we are concerned about the level of marketing around sustainability themes currently prevalent in the fashion industry and the disconnect between front-facing messaging and back-end real change. We are concerned that if companies and organizations are not open to taking on difficult questions, those questions and the issues that prompt them will be missed and remain unattended to. Specifically we seek to examine three areas:

Indices

Question 1 – While transparency continues
to be a popular term, it does very little to keep business within the natural
limits of earth’s resources. No current index links a company’s use of
resources to the earth’s capacity to supply those resources. How can such indices
be amended to include real ecological limits? Further, how can the actual
volumes that are produced be included in the evaluation of companies’
environmental performance?

Question 2 – The Higg index is the
culmination of many years of collaborative work. Yet worthy perspectives have
been excluded from it. Carbon sequestration practices in wool
production/ranching and maintaining garments in extended use and reuse are just
two examples that fall outside the parameters of the index. As the Higg index is
rolled out more broadly, how can those involved avoid amplifying the
shortcomings of the index and favouring only a narrow range of responses and
actions by industry and wearers?

Bringing
initiatives to scale

’Scaling up’
presupposes the conditions and values of the old industrial and consumer
economies. Meeting the scale of the problem of massive amounts of waste
generated by the old fashion system is of extreme urgency. Even more critical
is to scale the drawdown of conspicuous production and the rate of
virgin material extraction by the fashion industry.

Question 3 – How can Planet Textiles make
scaling the drawdown of conspicuous production the center
point of future conferences, including responsible reallocation of jobs and
application of knowledge and skills and maintaining living wages as we
transition out of the industrial and consumer economies?

Circularity

’Circular’
and ‘recycled’ are terms that are currently used interchangeably in fashion
industry marketing and discussions. If it were possible now for all the
garments in the fashion industry to flow into reuse and recycling systems,
circularity would not be achieved unless the draw-down of virgin material
garment production were also achieved.[i]

Question 4 – Since the infrastructure to
ensure true circularity of materials does not yet exist, how can a forum like
Planet Textiles call out ways in which the term is being used prematurely in
brand marketing claims?

Question 5 – Brand commitments to being
‘sustainable’ by a certain date no longer hold potency. We have seen dates pass
by and commitments re-calibrated and re-stated many times over. H&M has
made a commitment to be fully ‘circular’ by 2030, we wish to ask H&M at the
Planet Textiles conference to detail publicly its plans for:

  1. drawing down their conspicuous production of virgin
    fiber garments;
  2. tracking and measuring the total percentage of
    recycled fiber and new fiber in their business (rather than by product) and
    making this information fully transparent to the public;
  3. tracking and tracing globally sold and distributed
    garments and the total percentage of the business (rather than number of
    products) brought into circular reuse systems as well as recycling systems.



[i] For further reading see https://steadystate.org/a-journey-of-no-return-not-a-circular-economy/

3 Comments

  1. Im attending Planet Texiles. I would like to know who from signatories UCRF in order to meet us, if anyone ask let he/she knows .

    Im lauching my brand in near weeks, If it posible to share my ethos in order to have a feed back from the organization UCRF ? I would appreciete your opinions

    • Timo Rissanen says

      Dear Rocio,
      Thank you very much for your comment and support of the Union. Giving feedback to a brand would constitute a form of consulting, something the Union does not do in order to remain independent of any individual organizations or businesses. Sorry about this, and thank you once more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *